The Confidence-Competence Gap: Why Talented Women Undersell Their Expertise

A senior analyst was recently asked to present her findings to the executive team. She opened with: 'I might not have all the answers, but I've done some preliminary research...' The reality? She'd conducted a comprehensive six-month analysis with data from 12 markets. Her male colleague, presenting similar work, began with: 'Based on our research, here are three strategic recommendations.'

Both presentations contained good work. Only one positioned the presenter as a strategic advisor. Understanding why this pattern exists - and how to shift it - can transform how your expertise is perceived.

What the Research Reveals

Research from Cornell University found that women systematically underestimate their performance and abilities, whilst men overestimate theirs - by roughly the same magnitude. This isn't about women lacking confidence in general; it's specifically about how we assess and present professional competence.

The Australian Government's Workplace Gender Equality Agency study adds nuance: women are more likely to attribute success to external factors (luck, timing, team support) whilst attributing setbacks to personal shortcomings. Men show the opposite pattern. Neither is accurate, but both affect how expertise is communicated.

The Hedging Language Pattern

Linguistics research from Victoria University identified what they call 'competence disclaimers' - language patterns that undermine expertise even whilst demonstrating it. Women use these patterns significantly more than men in professional contexts:

• Qualification hedges: 'I think,' 'probably,' 'possibly,' 'I'm not sure but...' These signal uncertainty about information you actually know.

• Competence disclaimers: 'I'm not an expert,' 'This might be wrong,' 'I could be off base.' These preemptively lower expectations of your own expertise.

• Credit deflection: 'We were lucky,' 'The team did great work,' without clarifying your specific contribution. Acknowledging team effort is important; erasing your role is counterproductive.

The Australian Context: Balancing Humility and Authority

Australian workplace culture genuinely values humility and collaborative achievement. But research from the University of Melbourne shows there's a gender disparity in how this is interpreted: men's confidence is read as competence, whilst women's confidence risks being seen as arrogance.

The solution isn't adopting bombastic confidence that feels inauthentic. It's learning to present expertise clearly whilst maintaining collaborative framing. Instead of choosing between confidence and humility, strategic communication combines both.

The Reframing Framework

Research by Dr Carol Dweck at Stanford suggests what she calls 'confident humility' - being clear about what you know whilst remaining open to other perspectives. Here's how this translates practically:

• Replace 'I think we should...' with 'Based on the data, the recommended approach is...' This shifts from personal opinion to evidence-based recommendation.

• Replace 'This might be wrong, but...' with 'Here's what the analysis shows, and I'm interested in your perspective.' This maintains openness whilst presenting expertise clearly.

• Replace 'We were lucky' with 'The team's approach was effective because...' This acknowledges collaboration whilst identifying strategic factors.

• Replace 'I'm not an expert' with 'My experience in this area shows...' This grounds your perspective in actual knowledge rather than claiming universal expertise.

The Practice of Precision

The goal isn't eliminating all qualifying language - precision sometimes requires it. 'This data suggests' is accurate if you're presenting correlations, not causation. 'Based on available information' is appropriate if you're acknowledging gaps. The distinction is between strategic precision and habitual hedging. One demonstrates nuanced thinking; the other undermines competence you've legitimately earned.

You've developed expertise through years of work and learning. Presenting that expertise clearly isn't arrogance - it's accuracy. And in Australian professional contexts, you can absolutely present expertise clearly whilst remaining genuinely collaborative and open to input. These aren't mutually exclusive; they're both essential.

—

Want specific phrases that present expertise clearly? Head to the Resource Library and download The Confidence Cheat Sheet with power phrases for workplace situations.